Post by account_disabled on Jan 1, 2024 0:46:05 GMT -5
Aof interests regarding deputies and senators produces effects only for the future. . Regarding the relationship between Law no. and Law no. it is shown that there are no contradictions between them and even if there were such a contradiction the contest between the general and the special law is resolved in favor of the special one. . It is shown that there is a deficiency in the regulation of art. of the Criminal Code and a confusion between the conflict of interests in the Criminal Code and that provided for in Law no. right for which it is.
Appreciated that the interpreted law cannot constitute grounds Country Email List for criminal or disciplinary sanctions against deputies and senators for employing relatives in parliamentary offices before its entry into force. . Consequently it is shown that the conclusion cannot be drawn that a person is in a conflict of interests only based on the general principles provided by art. and of Law no. without the legal provisions expressly providing for situations in which deputies and senators are in conflict of interests. Extending the interpretation of.
Law no and its application to persons holding positions of public dignity without an express provision of the law would constitute an excess of power within the meaning of the Administrative Litigation Law no. . . The government considers that the objection of unconstitutionality is wellfounded. proposal violates the provisions of art. para. of the Constitution invoking in this sense the Decision of the Constitutional Court no. of October whereby it was noted that any new provision can be applied only from the date of its entry into force in order to respect the principle of nonretroactivity of the law enshrined in art. para. from the Constitution . even in the hypothesis that the.
Appreciated that the interpreted law cannot constitute grounds Country Email List for criminal or disciplinary sanctions against deputies and senators for employing relatives in parliamentary offices before its entry into force. . Consequently it is shown that the conclusion cannot be drawn that a person is in a conflict of interests only based on the general principles provided by art. and of Law no. without the legal provisions expressly providing for situations in which deputies and senators are in conflict of interests. Extending the interpretation of.
Law no and its application to persons holding positions of public dignity without an express provision of the law would constitute an excess of power within the meaning of the Administrative Litigation Law no. . . The government considers that the objection of unconstitutionality is wellfounded. proposal violates the provisions of art. para. of the Constitution invoking in this sense the Decision of the Constitutional Court no. of October whereby it was noted that any new provision can be applied only from the date of its entry into force in order to respect the principle of nonretroactivity of the law enshrined in art. para. from the Constitution . even in the hypothesis that the.
And in chorus, we learn how to read music. What about you?
But yeah, working on the missing location pictures. <3